Replies to '11/24 Great School Debate'

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2007, 9:15 am PST

Resources through public schools

Quote From: carolacoz

You indicated with No Child Left Behind and the programs instituted now at schools that there is "no excuse" for even "learning disabled" children not to succeed in a public school.  While these programs at the schools are wonderful, and my children have participated in them, the reason this is not an accurate statement is because some children have neurological problems that must be fixed before any program will cause a child to succeed in school--be it public or homeschool setting.  You cannot simply pour even more water into a pot with a hole in the bottom expecting the result to the different.

 

By way of example, if a child is left ear dominant and right eye dominant, no amount of continuous reading through reading clubs or other programs is going to fix that neurological confusion. Public schools are simply not required to resolve that, nor should they be responsible for doing so.  Your state has the 504, others have an IEP (individualized education plan).  Yes, a parent can request multiple services for their children using these documents/rights.  In my state, the school being asked to provide services has the right to refuse services a parent might think are necessary for their child to succeed on the basis that it is not a necessary service for the child's education.  For example, a parent may request at the IEP (as it is in my state) end of school year meeting that their child receive occupational therapy for a weak handgrip which results in poor, difficult, labored handwriting which will profoundly impact that child for the rest of his/her life, but most importantly demotivates a child to engage in writing at school.  The school can choose to deny those services on the grounds that the child can actually write.  Therefore, there are reasons for children not to succeed with the public school programs, and to suggest that a child with these problems is better off in public schools versus homeschooling is simply not accurate.

 

I am sure you are not trying to say that a child must endure bullying tactics at school to get a good job.  I am also sure you are not saying that only public schools can teach social skills or consequences for actions.  I think it is well-settled even herein that is not the case.

 

With regard to a family's decision to homeschool, a typical toddler takes in information at lightning speed, learns, digests that information within minutes, and moves on to the next conquest.  That doesn't change when they reach the age of 5 or 6.  However, at the age of 5 or 6, they enter public school and are then asked to sit quietly and spend 15 minutes learning about a frog.  This example is not an indictment of a public school.  Rather, it reveals a learning method which is one of the many reasons people may choose to homeschool their children.

 

I am glad you are finding wonderful success in public schools for your children.  I am finding great success for my children through homeschooling.

 

I agree with  your post to a point.  If a child has a neuroglogical problem, yes, this must be fixed and schooling , either public or homeschool alone, cannot do that.  However, I wonder if the average homeschooler has the training, financial means and access to the multiple doctors it may take to get the problem fixed.  I can say for myself I sure don't have any of the above.  We both work and the time and means it may take to solve this complex problem is far beyond us.  We are grateful we have a multitude of resources available to help us with things like this, if need be.  Just so you know, my son is ADHD and his school is great in helping us with that.  Never heard of a school (or teacher) denying help for a child.  However, in your example, what stops the parent from practicing with the child IN ADDITION to school?  I agree, many people hold public school responsible for things they should not be.  They have expectations that are not realistic and then decide to homeschool/unschool based on these un-met goals.  While there are some successes in the homeschool/unschool realm I also believe there are sucesses in the public school realm as well.  I also think teaching my child to act within expected norms is beneficial as well.    I don't think at age 5 having to learn about anyting for 10-15 minutes is unreasonable- if it were then public schools would not exist.   I believe kids should be kids when the time is right.  Learning to sit still, wait your turn, and most importantly that your behavior affects others are valuable lessons in my book.  This is what my son learns in school each day. 

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page