Replies to '12/25 Parent Trap'

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
November 1, 2007, 1:49 pm PDT

10/29 Parent Trap

Quote From: believeucan

First of all, the mother should be held accountable in some way shape or form!!! She's the one that started the whole thing to begin with. She lied, cheated and totally abused the marriage in the first place. Why isn't SHE being punished in all this??? Next, if a man doesn't KNOW that his wife cheated on him, how in the world would he suspect his "child" not being his own??? In my opinion, when a man is deceived by who is really a child's father, he should NOT have to pay child support once he does find out. I think he should have the right to CHOOSE if he continues to pay or not WITHOUT penalty. He should also be allowed to remain in the child's life as an active figure if the CHILD so chooses and he should not have to pay to continue the relationship. He was clearly wronged into thinking he was the father and if he  has proof he isn't, then the mother should be punised and that man should have free rain to choose his destiny with the child. Money doesn't have to be the issue. IF the man is not the father and he doesn't wish to continue paying for another man's child, BUT he wants to continue the relationship with the child he should be allowed to do that. (Afterall, didn't Ms. Allred state that the child was the one needing the attention??? What has that got to do with the man continuing to be deleted of his money after finding out he's not the father??) The child can still be the main focus, but the man shouldn't be punished for a deceptive mother!
 Maria got all that "child support" money  by deception. How much, I wonder, was actually spent on the two girls? There's no telling how much money Maria spent on herself, giving no thought to the girls.  No court should force a man to continue child support, once it's proven he isn't the father. And, if the court wants the "support" to continue, it should go directly to an account in the child's name. With a thrid party over-seer. Seeing that the money gets spent on no one's needs but the child's. To keep the mother from  blowing the money on her  own petty whims.
 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page