|
October 30, 2007, 6:55 am PDT
Paternity Fraud
Quote From: alaskanwomanMy personal opinion on this is regardless of whether he is the biological father, he still should have considered the child and never chose that way to inform this child of what he had found out. That is not her problem and he should have not stop the visitation. That was a selfish and childish move on his part to just deny her his visits, affection, his love after all those years to just cut it out just like that. I believe if I would have been in his shoes that I would have chose to still have a relationship with the girl but maybe not having to pay child support (if that was such an issue). If you have had a family together that many years and loved that little girl all those years, how in lthe world could you ever deny her your love even if she was not your biological daughter. Adopted parents love their children even if they are not the biological parent. I know that he was deceived and that was totally wrong on the mother part but still no reason for him to put the child in the middle of that problem between the adults. Adopteive par ents have made a conciuos choice to take in a child that
is not their biological progeny. Enrique and many others including my
husband did not have that choice. They were deceived and victimized,
and the court system and allyou peopleout there who blame Enrique for
what he did miss the big picture. And stop villifying Mia, the 2nd
wife, she is protecting herself and her family. Until you have been
through the family court system as we have, fighting this issue don't
make snapjudgements. We have been involved in the Courts to clean up
this mess since 1996 with no resolution. Maria is committing
parental alienation with both her daughters.
Nadine Mendelsohn-Ziskind
FCAPF
|