|
October 30, 2007, 12:56 pm PDT
"Best intrest of the child" should include supporting the child weather it be financial or emotional. The child is the one who was getting hurt in more ways than just emotional, did everyone forget that children need financial support as well as emotional
Quote From: delcomEveryone agrees that the father and daughter should continue their relationship but there are two other issues here.
1. Should a man have to pay child support for another's child. The simple answer for any thinking person is ABSOLUTELY NOT! The law needs to be changed so that victims are NOT required to pay for anothers crime (the woman's fraudulent claim of paternity). All amounts previously paid should be repaid to the man.
2. The other issue is that woman lawyer. She did not answer direct questions but rather changed the topic to other issues; she ranted and raved about the "best interest of the child" (nice legal term for family courts, like they know what that is!) when the topic was "should the man continue to pay?". She contributed nothing to the show except to show how she views the rights of inocent victims in these cases (short answer; they have none).
Bottom line: The man is a victim and the courts continue the crime when they require him to continue to pay. The mother should be prosecuted for fraud (a real crime) and be required to pay him back. When are we going to get this system fixed?
|
