Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Weird

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:24 pm PST

All Sarcasm Aside

Quote From: dnurkle

Please let me help to enlighten you - again - a broad generalization of what a 'homeschooling family is' is just as dangerous as a broad generalization about race. I will, however, simply speak of my own interactions with homeschoolers I know personally:

 

Quote

"Home school" children are not nearly as well socialized tend to get in more trouble later in life

 

Not so fast....do you socialize only with people within your age range? Are all your co-workers of the same graduating class year? No. Homeschoolers (again those whom I know) are by and large more equipped to socialize with all ages. They relate to peers with stability in their own identity, to elders with respect, to those younger without feeling 'stupid' for 'lowering themselves' to converse with a child.

 

I suspect your motivation is good, but your method will leave almost all children behind.

 

I graduated from a traditional college prep private school, got scholarships to college and still have learned more while teaching school (in a private school) and homeschooling my own children than I ever knew from my traditional school.

 

All children (public, private, homeschooled, unschooled) will be 'left behind' in some area or another. Most traditional school settings will not complete a text book or two in the year, jump certain chapters, and will certainly not take time for discussion or mastery of the topic. Unschooling and Homeschooling will likely not differ from traditional school and will still produce 'some' shortcomings, but then again, did all of your learning cease with graduation or has it been an ongoing experience?

 

As more people go the route of "home school", they weaken public school. Soon they vote against any measure that would raise funding for schools because it won't, after all, affect THEIR children.

 

I have not nor will I ever expect a tax break for educating my children at home. My taxes still go to the public school system in our area and I voted to RAISE assistance for the school system. In fact, I was President of the parent/teacher organization the year before our children left traditional school. Please do not make the generalization that homeschooling families are not committed to their community at large.

 

Home school is social and religious paranoia at its worst.

 

Many people choose to homeschool simply because for that child, it is an environment better suited to his/her learning style, nothing religious or social about it.

 

I really feel for the children who will have to raise their children in what will remain of society. Whatever it is at that point, it will not be a democracy.

 

Lastly, I would like to submit that statistically, more homeschooled students enroll in the military, or some form of politics, civil protective service (EMTs, Firefighters, Police, Civil Air Patrol, Coast Guard etc) than their public/private schooled counterparts. Since the percentage rate is higher for homeschooled students to enter such felids, I believe our Democratic Society is quite protected, safe and well in tact.

 

(educate me again?   lol)  The post you replied to here is one based on MY experiences with home school.  Each of the statements you refer to are based on factual experience.  You responded based on your experiences.  Your experiences are no more valid than are mine.  Mine may be the exceptions to the rule.  i sincerely hope so.  I fear yours may be the exceptions.  If the latter is true, would you not find that ominous?  For all of us, I do hope you are right in your assessment.  If I am wrong, I do not take issue with being taken to task.

 

   Best wishes

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:30 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: tinkerbell123

You say, you doubt your efforts and even the efforts of other homeschooled parents combined could effect change soon enought, to effect YOUR children.  Don't you care about your children's, children.  It may not effect your childs generation, but it may effect your grandchilds generation.  Also, if all the women in our countries past (Elizabeth Statton, Susan B. Anthony, etc.) thought that way, You as a woman wouldn't really have a say at all in your childs education!!! 

 

You are sheltering your children.  I too discuss sex, drugs, pot, etc.  with my children, and they may hear that on a bus, or be confronted with drugs.  So they learn "by experience" to say No.  As opposed to being told about what COULD happen and IF it happens.  And homeschooled parents tend to only discuss the negative aspects of what you don't want your children to learn from other children.  What about the positive influences other children can have on your kids?  or the positive influences teachers, administration and staff could have. 

I don't believe our children need to learn everything by "experience".   This "experience"  can be had when they are older.  What is it with parents that feel their children need to learn to say no to drugs (or whatever else) by actually experiencing it?  I get so frustrated that we feel we have the right to submit our children to all of the crap that is out there in order to prepare them for the real world.  This world is getting worse every day - protect, protect, protect.  Protect by giving them all of the knowledge necessary to make wise decisions.  When you feel they are ready then we start to let go -I'm not sure age 5 or 6 (school age) is that age for my child.

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:31 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: alasandra2003

As for my 10th Grade English Class - what 10th grader is going to rat out a public school teacher that is letting him/her do whatever they want?

 

I was having FUN, I had plenty of class time to chat with my friends and socialize. It wasn't until 11th grade that I realized that skipping a whole year of English left me behind. Of course since I was an honors student and self motivated I caught up on my own.

Not to mention, I learned VERY early on who wins in the argument of "my word vs your word."  It was the person with the cleverest wording tactics.  Ask me how I know ;-)  To read my highschool report cards sometimes my parents would wonder if different teachers accidentally stuck a different child's report in there by mistake.



 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:33 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: alasandra2003

Well homeschoolers can always homeschool their grandkids ;>)

 

As a taxpayer I work for change in the public school system.

 

As a parent I choose to homeschool because it is the best educational choice for my children.

 

I have noticed that those who demand parents leave their kids in public schools for the good of society tend to either be childless or they are able to live in high end neighborhoods with good school districts. It's awfully easy to condemn people for not doing things for the good of society when it doesn't affect you or your family. Also what possible benefit is it to society to leave a child in a public school that is failing him just so society can say he received a public education? Isn't it far better to homeschool your child and give him the skills necessary to get into college, have a successful career etc. ?

 

As for peer pressure. What is it with you anti-homeschooling people, you don't seem to have a clue that homeschooled kids interact with public school kids all the time. Our kids go to the mall, they play with kids in their neighborhood (and yes public school kids live in our neighborhood), they chat on-line with their friends, and homeschooled teens often work after school and their co-workers are often public school kids.

I have noticed that those who demand parents leave their kids in public schools for the good of society tend to either be childless or they are able to live in high end neighborhoods with good school districts. It's awfully easy to condemn people for not doing things for the good of society when it doesn't affect you or your family. Also what possible benefit is it to society to leave a child in a public school that is failing him just so society can say he received a public education? Isn't it far better to homeschool your child and give him the skills necessary to get into college, have a successful career etc. ?

 

I do agree with you here. I live in a high income area with good public schools, so that does influence my perspective. This whole debate board has prompted my husband and I to have some serious conversations about our children and what we want for them. We are still coming down on the side of public schools, but we know we don't have to write anything down in stone.

 

I disagree with the notion of schools failing kids. The reality is that kids are failing school. There are many factors that play into this, but I think it is important to remember that schools simply are not capable of curing all of society's ill. The majority of people who struggle with dysfunctional lives are poor. So schools in poorer areas have greater struggles.

 

I sympathize with parents who simply cannot put their kids in schools with gang members, druggies, children who are so disruptive that the teacher can, at best, try for crowd control. I also see that many, not all, of these parents are NOT equipped to homeschool. We MUST make greater efforts to improve the state of public schools so EVERY child can get a chance at a quality education, regardless of their parents' finances, education, emotional stability, intellectual abilities, etc.

 

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:33 pm PST

testing, testing, testing

Quote From: ponder

 Don't expect such a show from Dr. Phil.  I daresay he never visited this topic in his own mind once that show was over.  He won't dream of reading this board regarding his own show and righting an obvious disservice to millions of parents who believe in "Getting Excited About Their Lives"  in a way that takes their own families' best interests to heart.
As for the testing problem that you refer to, in the eighties and early nineties, before the testing began, schools turned out so many uneducated graduates, that our population is woefully ignorant.  There was no way to make sure that schools were teaching the kids anything at all.  My freshman American History class covered.
1. The Leopold and Loeb murder case
2. The Kennedy assassination
3.The Cold War (to exhaustion - no one could ever repeat the definition to the teacher's satisfaction)
4. The two Atom bombs from WWII
5.  The basic outline of our three branches of US gov't., and the Bill of Rights
 
It is true that no. 5 represented real, relevant subject matter, but we did it again, senior year in Civics.  It represents subject matter for government, not history class.  I promise you, I could not have passed any kind of true history exam.  We learned nothing (and neither does anyone else) about the sacrifices and true events of the founding of this nation.  I have learned so much more, just from reading well-researched historical fiction as an adult, than any classes in any school, anywhere.  As for English class, my kids are learning so much more grammar and vocabulary, since they have to pass a test, that their junior high classes actually went back to diagramming sentences.  I'm just shocked that their teacher had the expertise to conduct such a basic "old-school" exercise.   I understand the criticisms against the standardized tests, but what other way is there to see if schools are teaching anything? 
 I guess there is nothing that we can do about the testing per se, because of the accountability issue.  My problem is the stress related to passing the test.  Teachers are so scared about losing their jobs that they literally have children filling out practice test books and questions for months and months before the testing.  Slower learners are drilled and drilled. 

What kind of excitement about learning is that going to spark?  There will be a backlash from this type of pencil/paper rote learning.  Free thinking will be diminished. 

If there was a national curriculum that has been developed by educators and tested by real educators that would help tremedously.  Give the teachers the curriculum, allow them to teach, like they hoped and dreamed to when they were in college, and then test at the end of the year to see how it went.  But this test, test, test, everyone will pass crap is for the birds.  God didn't make everyone the same way and squeezing everyone into the square hole isn't going to work. 
 

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:44 pm PST

laws and rules

Quote From: amyjo304

For example, curfews as children get older.   What should and should not be worn in terms of clothing.  I am all for allowing a child to grow and mature, but if it were so easy for children to do it on their own God would not have placed parents on this earth.  He simply would have said "Here you go baby.  Have at it!"  We are here to teach and guide are children.  There are rules all around us.  Contrary to belief a law is a rule just under a different name.  Sure, eat all of the junk food you want and when your teeth rot out of your head we'll throw it out there as a learning experience.  I am planning on homeschooling and have no problems with home schooling, but some things should not ALWAYS be left up to the child.  Children do not have a knowledge base to pull from an education, whether homeschooling or public/private school, sheds lights on subjects that an unschooled child would not have a chance to know whether to like it or not.  I don't think it is ridiculous to think that children are intelligent, but just because one is intelligent does not mean that they have the tools they need to be productive in their own education.
are not the same.  There is a very different set of consequences for breaking each of them.  That said, I realize how difficult it is to understand that children are capable of making responsible choices.  In regards to your examples; in a home where a parent does not fill the house with junk food, how would a child eat as much inappropriate food as they like and rot their teeth?  If children are taught from early on that we must respect our one and only set of teeth, it's not unreasonable to believe that they will learn to take good of them.  Also, eating junk food, as my children will gladly explain to you, should be kept to a minimum as it's  a poor fuel choice for their body.    Unschooled children that I know, and I know and know of many, are exposed to a far, far broader range of information and 'subjects' as you wrote, then children who are guided through their education at home or in school.  We are somewhat middle of the road with some structure (at my children's request) and many hours of self guided learning.   
Your statement:
"I don't think it is ridiculous to think that children are intelligent, but just because one is intelligent does not mean that they have the tools they need to be productive in their own education."  This is precisely why unschooling can be very effective with the right type of parents involved.  A child does have the tools they need to be productive in their own education. 
Again though, it's very difficult to have someone understand this without living it. 
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:55 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: janiesmith

I don't believe our children need to learn everything by "experience".   This "experience"  can be had when they are older.  What is it with parents that feel their children need to learn to say no to drugs (or whatever else) by actually experiencing it?  I get so frustrated that we feel we have the right to submit our children to all of the crap that is out there in order to prepare them for the real world.  This world is getting worse every day - protect, protect, protect.  Protect by giving them all of the knowledge necessary to make wise decisions.  When you feel they are ready then we start to let go -I'm not sure age 5 or 6 (school age) is that age for my child.

I agree.
I was in public school, and it may be worthy of note that I wasn't actually offered drugs for the first time until I was in my 20s.

My parents didn't drink alcohol, save for the occasional glass of wine if they went to a social occasion, but even then they drank about 1/4 of it, sipping to avoid looking the part of a prude.  So we didn't have a "liquor cabinet" in our house.  Does that mean I was ill-equipped to make responsible decisions about alcohol?

My parents never smoked, and likewise I was never offered cigarettes from anyone.  Does that mean I didn't have the experience to make a wise decision because nobody tried to push it on me?

My parents were never arrested, neither was I.  Does that mean I have no clue that there may be some people who break the law?

That aside, nobody in our society is exempt from these things.  A close relative of mine was taught about drugs via a guest speaker at his school. He came home, and his mother and he had the heart to heart talk about it.  He wound up using drugs and nearly destroyed his life, but for the grace of God and love of his family who helped him with the painful process of getting off drugs.

The fact that many in our society today use drugs is not evidence that they were either unschooled, not educated about it, or failed to have the heart to heart about it.  Drugs is a choice people either say yes or no to.

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 1:57 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: julie1418

I have noticed that those who demand parents leave their kids in public schools for the good of society tend to either be childless or they are able to live in high end neighborhoods with good school districts. It's awfully easy to condemn people for not doing things for the good of society when it doesn't affect you or your family. Also what possible benefit is it to society to leave a child in a public school that is failing him just so society can say he received a public education? Isn't it far better to homeschool your child and give him the skills necessary to get into college, have a successful career etc. ?

 

I do agree with you here. I live in a high income area with good public schools, so that does influence my perspective. This whole debate board has prompted my husband and I to have some serious conversations about our children and what we want for them. We are still coming down on the side of public schools, but we know we don't have to write anything down in stone.

 

I disagree with the notion of schools failing kids. The reality is that kids are failing school. There are many factors that play into this, but I think it is important to remember that schools simply are not capable of curing all of society's ill. The majority of people who struggle with dysfunctional lives are poor. So schools in poorer areas have greater struggles.

 

I sympathize with parents who simply cannot put their kids in schools with gang members, druggies, children who are so disruptive that the teacher can, at best, try for crowd control. I also see that many, not all, of these parents are NOT equipped to homeschool. We MUST make greater efforts to improve the state of public schools so EVERY child can get a chance at a quality education, regardless of their parents' finances, education, emotional stability, intellectual abilities, etc.

 

"We MUST make greater efforts to improve the state of public schools so EVERY child can get a chance at a quality education, regardless of their parents' finances, education, emotional stability, intellectual abilities, etc. "

Exactly. This is for the good of our society in general. Even if I do home school my daughter I will very much be in-tuned to the public school system and I will continue, as I do now to vote for people who I think will improve the situation. These kinds of things.

There are parents who cannot afford private school, cannot afford better neighborhoods and cannot take time off work to home school, as you said, these kids deserve as much of a chance in life as any one else.
 

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 2:03 pm PST

did you have a terrible experience being home schooled?

Quote From: flrat69

You are quite correct to say that those who do not fit into social classes and cliques suffer because of it.  The answer, however, is to work to elimante those things.  Scrapping the system leaves children in the great void of "home school".
Or homes schooling your own children perhaps?  With such strong opinions one would have to presume that you have had first hand experience with home learning.  Often that is not the case though. People choose to remain ignorant on the topic and then comment strongly against it. 

How do you feel about parents who scrap the public system for the greener pastures of private schools?   Are they also aiding in dismantling public schooling?  What about young actors, elite young athletes?  Many of them homeschool.  Home schooling is not exactly a flash in the pan.  It has a rich existence and history, and it continues to grow.  It is not simply a last resort amongst parents displeased with public education.  It is an educational choice and an excellent one at that.

There is no "great void of "home school".  Where participate in  large and strong communities for our  home learning life.  We also find it simple to fit into any community events or activities where the majority of children will not be home learners.  There are times though, when we are fitting in very well and then suddenly someone brings up the question "what school do you go to" and the answer seems to give the green light for open discrimination.  The reverse does not happen in our own community.  Please note I am referring to the community I have direct experience in only.

Considering the small percentage of home schoolers overall in North America, I"d be interested to hear the explanation for all the social misfits that are alive in well.  Is there social status attributed to the public school system?  People are people, some fit better into society 'norms' than others.  I personally enjoy more the free thinker, the ones who do not follow trends to 'fit in' and those are highly socially and globally aware. Much more interesting than those who are concerned about the 'right' clothing labels, current trends, who has what, who will get what and who is considered popular for such important reasons as hair, make-up, address and body shape. 
A tad of sarcasm thrown in for good measure.
My spouse and I fit wonderfully in our own social class and clique. One filled  with highly affluent people who work to better our world, not through acculumation but through using our affluence in a way that can make a difference. We may not be with the "in crowd" of adults whom dine out, attend many social functions and dress in designer clothes.  We do however, feel very   comfortable with and fulfilled by our relationships.  We hope this for our children as adults.  I truly hope they are not raised to over identify with their social class.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 27, 2006, 2:07 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: elffie

I am not going to homeschool, I don't think it will benefit MY children.  I don't think it would be healthy for them to be with me all day, they need to get out and be with other kids their age in an environment that will support that.  Plus, I want them to get the best education they can get, even if that means public schools.  There are lots of Merit schools in the town my children will be going to and the kids score very high on their tests. 

 

The only difference I see between Public and Private schools is the cost.  Also, that some private schools are religious based.  You can find the same classes in public school without the cost.  I don't think we need to push our children academically, and honestly I think it's a little too much to have a kindergardner doing 3rd grade work.  Now, if they child is capable of doing it, then so be it, but I do not think it's wise to push kids while they are so young.

 

There is bullying and crime if private school as well.  I had a friend that went to a Christian private school and the kids there did drugs and had sex on the property!  Same thing that was going on in the public school system.

 

I don't think homeschooling really teaches responsibility.  Some of the time it is not structured and it is only for a couple hours a day.  Going out of the house to school reinforces responsibility and teaching the student to be liable for their actions.  Sure, there were a few days when I didn't want to go to school, but I could not have stayed home.  I would not be socially mature, but that is me, it could be different for others.  Plus, leaving home to go to school prepared me for the real world, where you leave your house and you do what you have to do, even if you don't like it.

 

So it looks like public schooling for my kids. 

There seem to be many people replying that have no experience on either side of the topic and a few only have one sided experiences or opinions.

 

I homeschool my children, all of them.  I attended and graduated from public school and college as did my husband.  We were both teachers, our families range from low on the pole in the system to the highest administrative postion.  We both have experience on both sides of the road.

 

If people homeschool for the right reasons, homeschooling does benefit children, it is healthy for children to be with their parents and be surrounded by people that truly care about their enviroment, love them like no one else can and provide them with education and life experiences that will help them to become productive and caring adults.  We are not allowing our children to mediocre or to become little drones of any system.

 

Homeschooling is not for everyone, true.  There can be huge differences in public and private schools, besides the cost.  It all depends upon the state and area you live in.  Not everyone can afford to move or purchase a home in a specific school district and therefore their children end up paying for their living location. 

 

Homeschooling does teach responsibility, the time used for education is normally structured and it is more than a couple of hours per day.  I hate to think that people seriously believe that having children and sending them elsewhere to "reinforce" responsibility and liability is the correct road to go down.  If that is the case then the parents are not doing THEIR job. 

 

Homeschooled children are generally more socialized and prepared for the "real world" that many other children.  I refuse to think that another child the same age as my child has the correct moral values and social skills to socialize my child.  It is my responsibility to socialize my child, teach them about responsibility and liability, to teach my child compassion and to know him/her better than anyone.  I gave birth to all of my children and I am the best teach in education and in life that they could ever have.  If that weren't the case, why should I have had children.  I shouldn't have. PERIOD.

 

It is not the responsibility of our society to take care of, nuture and educate my children.  That responsibility lies on my back and the back on my husband. 

 

Again, homeschooling is not for everyone, but generally the people willing to take on the huge responsibility of homeschooling take it very seriously and want only the best for their children.  We spend large amounts of money, endless time and all of our hearts in doing what is best for our children.  I am the parent, it is my choice to do what is best for MY child.  And my tax dollars still go to help support the children and schools in my district even though I do not utilize them.

 

Colleges are actively seeking homeschooled students now, because they see the value of independent thinkers, children that are self motivated and take responsibility seriously.  They see that homeschooled students are good for their campus and that these students are normally high achievers that will go out and better the world. One of my children are proof positive and I believe that earning their masters and becoming productive Americans is enough said.

 

I do not talk badly about public schools, I have worked within them, however, it is my choice to homeschool and do what I feel is best for my children.  However, I do think that the NCLB is ok in theory, but the implementaion is horrible and I am not willing to allow it to determine the fate of my children. 

 

Unschooling is another aspect of homeschooling, it can work and sometimes it does not.  It is up to the student and the parents to make that choice. 

 

Our government does not see it this way, but the ultimate decision for a child's education should be up to the parents.  If you cannot be a responsible parent, you should not have children.

 

I could go on and on, but I won't.  Enough said, for now.

 
First | Prev | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | Next | Last