Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 9:14 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: kschmittz

"What do you think it means to be "educated?"

  In my opinion, this means having working knowledge in an array of basic subjects- math, science, literature, language, reading, social studies, etc.  Yes, having knowledge in different things means -in my opinion -being well rounded or having a well rounded education.  However, unless you live in China, learning Chinese at age 5 is no more useful than some of the things homeschoolers claim ridiculous in a PS environment.  Why then if they learn certain knowledge in a HS environment -like Chinese- is it considered enriching but in a PS environment it is cruel, useless,  and unnecesary?  I have no doubts that a homeschool/unschool environment can be fun and enriching.  I just don't think this continually fun and carefree place is what the real world will be like.  I think a lot- not all- homeschoolers/unschoolers have their own agenda.  The majority that go on TV and state their case almost always have had some type of unpleasant experience within the PS system.  Unfortunately, the world will not tailor or create an environment that works for every person.  Maybe teaching our young to adapt in an imperfect world might be more practical.  Teaching them to overcome weakness and work through struggles to gain a true sense of accomplishment might be beneficial in adult years.  Yes, I believe that education is important in today's world.  Education, however, doesn't guarantee that children will be well-liked and respected.  To "make it" in life means  more than having a lot of knowledge.  There are things involved like character, integrity,  and honesty to name a few.   I do not feel the PS system is responsible to teach these things- that is my job as a parent.  I do feel parents expect these things from PS and that is a shame.  It is a conjunction with home life that makes a child successful in ANY environment.  For example, I regularly use what my son has learned in school to apply in real life.  I am in the classroom each week.  I volunteer time and money to fund the school's PTA and other organizations.  I show my son his school is important. 

 

That said, as much as I try to appreciate homeschoolers/unschoolers I don't think public schoolers received the same back.  That , to me, is teaching intolerance and discrimination.   There is an extreme sense of arrogance and superiority in the choice to unschool/homeschool.  This was seen on the show with the statement of "..my unschooler will hire your honor student."  To me, this just shows that an unschooler has ideas but no discipline to implement them to run a functional, profitable business.  Again, learning Chinese is only useful in China- the same concept applies here.  Many kids can be taught a multitude of things but without discipline, structure and actual implementation in everyday life the knowledge is nothing more than a feather in their hat.  I hope you see what I am trying to point out.  There are many things homeschoolers/unschoolers cannot seem to piece together for a cohesive theory.  They don't want to be questioned or challenged in their decision.  I have always thought that if you don't want to be questioned then maybe you shouldn't question others...just a thought. 

I have a hunch that many well educated people--in particular those in the business world would disagree when you say  learning Chinese is useless.

How much of the American business industry is being outsourced to China? To India? American workers are seriously starting to need to compete for jobs that are going to workers in other countries who companies can get away with paying smaller salaries. My dad, a doctor and Harvard grad. (and yes, he is an unschooling parent :) ) was telling me that even drug companies are being outsourced to Asia. My uncle knows of a business that moved to China in the hopes of joining the competition. My uncle, himself, a neurologist travels to Asia all the time.  He certainly would disagree with you.





 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 9:38 am PST

I'm pro-choice

The effects of the choice we make to educate our children is so situational that it is irrational to believe that we can make global conclusions regarding which educational option is best for all children. This is just another way of institutionalizing the human personality and giving ourselves the illusion that we can predict and manipulate the outcome. We can research, theorize, examine, and statistisize education until we turn blue but in the end all we are doing is giving society an open door to dictate yet another aspect of raising our children.

Choosing how your children are educated is, and always should be, the right of the parents. Putting any type of education in a box and labeling it bad or improper shows a lack of support for the parent's right to make decisions for their children and is dangerous ground to tread on. By trying to mandate what is right and acceptable for another family you are essentially opening the door to others to mandate what is right and acceptable in your family.  

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 9:50 am PST

Choice

I think we must all realize one thing.  We live in a country that allows us the freedom of choice.  We need to choose the school setting that will be most beneficial to our OWN children.  To say public school is better then private school or private school is better then homeschooling is really a matter of opinion.  Each individuals needs are different and the school setting can make a difference in a child's education. I personally believe that a parents responsibility is to give their child the best education.  The child's education is the path to THEIR future.  To debate the matter of which setting is better is really fruitless, you can only speak from experience.  If you were educated in a public school setting and it was a good experience..then by all means...public school was a good choice for you.  If you were home schooled and you had a good experience ...then by all means...that was a good choice for you.  I have three children, all have been home schooled.  My oldest sons went to public and private schools before I started homeschooling them.  They have both graduated, taken the GED (with extremely high scores) and gone to college.  My youngest is in the 11th grade and has very high SAT scores.  For my family, homeschooling was a good choice.  I will not sit here and tell you all that it is the choice for you.  But, I will suggest that before you make a black and white statement about public vs homeschooling...I would first research them both to make an educated statement. 
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
sad
November 28, 2006, 9:55 am PST

WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?

I am absolutely amazed by the anger on this board over unschool vs. homeschool vs. public school. All three educational processes offer something different. I have four children; each has a different learning style and different needs. Individuals are not "one size fits all".

 

Unschooled offers unstructured learning. This is my least favorite form of education but I can see the benefits of allowing a child develop opinions, ideas, beliefs, and so much more without the pressure of someone else forcing their choices on the child.

 

Homeschooling offers a more structured learning process. Most of these children have the same type of education as those in the public school system but they are allowed to learn at their own pace. These children can move as fast or as slow as needed based upon their own learning styles and needs. There are more opportunities for hands-on learning and field trips. The down side? Not all parents have the ability or opportunity to provide a good homeschooling experience.

 

The public school system is the most commonly accepted and used educational process but is a "one size fits all" system. All students are expected to follow the same basic program. There is a certain amount of material that has to be covered during the school year therefore we cannot slow down for those children who are having difficulties. Good teachers will provide extra help before or after school for those who need it but too many students cannot take advantage of these offerings. For the student whose mind races forward and who excels in their education.... well, there isn't much to be offered.

 

I do not feel I have the ability to teach my children so they are in the public school system. It is a decision I constantly doubt. The social aspects of school have been horrible. The bullies have been many of the teachers and administrators. Too many of the teachers are not qualified to teach the subjects they are teaching. (Yes, I have checked on the teacher’s qualifications.) We recently attended parent/teacher conferences and were told that the other students are holding our oldest back. This is the same student that was told during enrollment that taking Algebra 2, Biology 2, and Geometry along with his other subjects would be too difficult for him and that they had never given anyone that hard a schedule. He does not fit into the "one size fits all" mold. As for test scores.... according to the state web page, 59% of this schools 8th graders are at satisfactory or advanced levels in math...62% in reading. To me, this is unacceptable!

 

This will be my third post on this subject. One post is,  "YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK". I haven't noticed too many people interested in what is really happening to the money you pay into the system. Whether you are an advocate of unschooled, homeschool, or the public education system your tax dollars go to the public school system and it is EVERYONE'S responsibility to find out how your tax dollar is being spent. It seems that many are too busy attacking each other about their choices and too few are busy trying to find ways to support each other and their choices. In the long run, all of our children suffer. Everyone, get involved in your local school district. Whether you homeschool or not. Find out the teachers qualifications, where the school money is being spent, who your school board members are, and attend school board meetings. Everyone has this right. Please use it.

 

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 10:05 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: _marie_

I didn't know what "unschooling" is, so I looked it up on Wikipedia:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unschooling

 

I have raised a child to adulthood...and he would not have learned about US History, World History, Algebra, Geometry, Algebra II, Trig, Calculus, American Lit, English Lit, Philosophy and a whole slough of other subjects via "unschooling".

 

My daughter aspires to be a doc, my son (right now) aspires to be a lawyer...neither of these professions can be learned through unschooling.

 

Also...I think my son wouldn't have made it to his 4 year university via unschooling...the SATs are brutal...and entail more than what can be learned through everyday life.

 

Marie

I was unschooled, got a full scholarship to a 4 year university, and I'm finishing up a Phd in genetics. I also know more about us and world histort then many of my peers, I've read more then many of my graduate school peers ( a highly educated bunch) abd I've taught math, logic and ethics at the university level. Clearly unschoolers can learn these things, I expect your son may have surprised you had he been unschooled.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 10:06 am PST

Education Debate

I agree with the comments that this really is a fruitless debate. What is important is that we live in a country that allows us many educational options when deciding what is best for each of our individual children. Home schooling is just another "tool in the tool box" for parents in deciding how best to equip our children for the future. Thankfully, the decision of how to best equip our children for the future IS a protected right of parents. There is no doubt that we all need help and advice and thankfully there are so many resources now available to parents. This "debate" reminds me of the "stay-at-home" versus "working" mom debates. Where once society told us what women should and were expected to do, we now have a diversity of choices to choose from in deciding what best fits and serves our families. It's a lovely country to live in!!!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 10:20 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

I think we can all agree that some children do not do well in a public school environment. Some parents should not homeschool their children. As for non schooling, I have never heard of this. We do learn things from everyday life but not everyone speaks proper English and that is not something I want my children learning wrong. I did not go to school to teach, but I homeschool and I teach at the private school at our church. We have 12-16 year old kids coming in from the public school that can't even read. The teachers read the tests to them rather than take the time to teach them to read. There are some great teachers out there that love what they are doing and why they are really there; but lets face it there are some teachers that have and are dropping the ball for the extra bonus they get for teaching the "test". There should be no bonus' for teachers whose class gets better scores than others on the EOG. The public school system has and is failing our children. I homeschool because God burdened my heart to do so. I have a great curriculum and not only do they learn English and Math they learn life skills. When I was pregnant with my son 3 years ago my then 13 year old daughter was able to go through this process with me. She will never learn that in public school. Not the way I want her to anyway. She not only learned the process and the beauty of having a child but the morals that we have instilled in her of no sex before marriage and that having a child is not about "something to love".  I have a real problem with our school system pushing condoms in our childs face and saying have safe sex instead of teaching them abstinance. I do understand this is also an individual choice and that teenagers have to make those decisions on there own and reap the consequences. However when parents set high standards for their children and the school system gives them alternatives they are in essence breaking down the parents teachings at home. This is a sensitive debate and everyone has an opinion, but there are some real issues with the public schools. As far as the word Socialization goes I would like for you to read this: Please take the extra time to read this. You never know you may learn something.

The word makes my skin crawl. As homeschoolers, we are often accosted by people who assume that since we're homeschooling, our kids won't be "socialized." The
word has become such a catch phrase that it has entirely lost any meaning.

The first time I heard the word, I was attending a Catholic day school as a
first grader.

Having been a "reader" for almost 2 years, I found the phonics and reading
lessons to be incredibly boring. Luckily the girl behind me felt the same way,
and when
we were done with our silly little worksheets, we would chat back and forth.
I've never known two 6 yr. olds who could maintain a quiet conversation, so
naturally a ruler-carrying nun interrupted us with a few strong raps on our
desk. We were both asked to stay in at recess, and sit quietly in our desks for
the entire 25 minutes, because "We are not here to socialize, young ladies."

Those words were repeated over and over throughout my education, by just
about every teacher I've ever had. If we're not there to socialize, then why were
we
there? I learned to read at home. If I finished my work early (which I always
did,) could I have gone home? If I were already familiar with the subject
matter, would I have been excused from class that day? If schools weren't
made for socializing, then why on earth would anyone assume that homeschoolers
were
missing out?

As a society full of people whose childhoods were spent waiting anxiously for
recess time, and trying desperately to "socialize" with the kids in class; It
is often difficult for people to have an image of a child whose social life
is NOT based on school buddies. Do you ever remember sitting in class, and
wanting desperately to speak to your friend? It's kind of hard to concentrate
on the lessons when you're bouncing around trying not to talk. Have you ever
had
a teacher who rearranged the seats every now and then, to prevent talking,
splitting up friends and "talking corners." Were you ever caught passing notes
in class?

Now- flash forward to "real life." Imagine the following scenes:

Your Employer is auditing the Inter-Office Email system and comes across a
personal note between you and a coworker. You are required to stand at the
podium in the next sales meeting to read it aloud to your coworkers.

The Police knock on your door, and announce that because you and your
neighbor have gotten so close, they're separating you. You must move your home and
your belongings to the other side of town, and you may only meet at public
places on
weekends.

You're sitting at a booth waiting for a coworker to arrive for a scheduled
lunch date. Suddenly a member of upper management sits down across from you and
demands your credit cards. When your friend arrives, you just order water and
claim you're not hungry, since he stole your lunch money.

You're applying for a job and in an unconventional hiring practice, you are
made to line up with other applicants, and wait patiently while representatives
from two competing companies take their pick from the lineup.

You're taking your parents out for an anniversary dinner. After you find a
table, a waiter tells you that seniors have a separate dining room, lest they
"corrupt" the younger members of society.

You go to the grocery store only to find that since you are 32 years old you
must shop at the store for 32 year olds. It's 8 miles away and they don't sell
meat
because the manager is a vegetarian, but your birthday is coming up and soon
you'll be able to shop at the store for 33 yr. olds.

You'd like to learn about Aviation History. You go to the library and check
out a book on the subject only to be given a list of "other subjects" that you
must read about before you are permitted to check out the aviation book.

You're having a hard time finding what you need in the local department
store. The saleslady explains that each item is arranged alphabetically in the
store, so
instead of having a section for shoes, you will find the men's shoes in
between the maternity clothes and the mirrors.

Your Cable Company announces that anyone wishing to watch the Superbowl this
year must log on a certain number of hours watching the Discovery Channel
before
they can be permitted to watch the game.

You apply for a job only to be told that this job is for 29 year olds. Since
you're 32, you'll have to stay with your level.

In a group project, your boss decides to pair you up with the person you
don't "click" with. His hope is that you'll get learn to get along with each
other, regardless of how the project turns out.

These absurd examples were created to point out how absolutely ridiculous the
idea of "socializing" in schools is. Many people had a friend who they stayed
friends with all through grammar school- WHY? Because their names were
alphabetically similar, and they always ended up in line with each other. As an
adult, have you ever made friends with someone simply because your names were
similar? How long would such a friendship last and how meaningful would it be,
providing you had nothing else in common?

People often use the bully as an example of why it's so important to let kids
"socialize" at school. If that's so important, then the bully needs to go to
JAIL after a few months, because self-respecting society simply doesn't put up
with that, nor should my 6 yr. old. Sure, there are crappy people in the
world, but the world does a much better job of taking care of these things. A
bullying brat in the first grade will
still be a bullying brat in the 6th grade. He will still be picking on the
same kids year after year after year, unless he moves to a new town. How long
would the average adult put up with a bully? Personally, as an adult, I have
only come across one
grown up bully. I choose not to be around this miserable woman. So do many
other people. THAT is real life. If she were a coworker, I would find a
different job. If she worked at a business I patronized- not only would I refrain from
doing business with that company, I would write a letter to the bully, her
manager, the owner and the main office. A kid in a classroom has no way to
emotionally protect themselves
against such a person. I would never expect my kids to put up with bad
treatment from a bully in the name of "toughening them up." For what? So they can be
submissive wimps when they grow up too? So they can "ignore" their miserable
bosses and abusive spouses?In real life, if an employer discovered that an
employee was harassing the other staff members, that employee could be fired
(pending the 90 day evaluation) or relocated. In real life, if you are so
dreadfully harassed by a coworker you can seek legal recourse independently. In a
classroom, the teacher
and other children are often powerless.

The idea of learning acceptable social skills in a school is as absurd to me
as learning nutrition from a grocery store.

As Homeschoolers, the world is our classroom. We interact with people of all
ages, sexes and backgrounds. We talk to and learn from everyone who strikes
our interest. We use good manners in our home and I'm always pleased when others
comment on the manners my children have picked up. I believe good manners to
be an important social skill.

Respecting common areas is also of value to us. We often carry a grocery bag
with us on walks, in case we find trash that needs to be discarded. When we're
waiting at a bus stop, if there is trash on the ground, we make a point to
carry it onto the bus and discard of it properly. Once, while waiting at a bus
stop- we saw a grown man drop his popsicle wrapper on the ground. He was 2 feet
from a trash can- My daughter looked up at me with eyes as big as saucers. I
told her (out loud) "It must have blown out of his hand from that little wind,
because no-one would throw
trash on the ground on purpose. I'm sure when he's done with his popsicle, he
will pick it up and throw it away correctly- otherwise, we can take care of it
so we don't have an ugly world." He did pick it up, rather sheepishly. I
can't imagine expecting my children to have a respect for the cleanliness of
common areas in an environment where bathroom walls are covered in graffiti and
trees are scratched with
symbols of "love" of all things.

Another social skill we strive to teach our children is that all people are
created equal. I can't imagine doing that in an environment where physically
disadvantaged children are segregated into a "special" classroom. Or even
children who speak a different language at home. They are segregated and forced to
learn English, while never acknowledging the unique culture they were raised
in, and not enabling the
other students to learn FROM them. Learning, in school, comes from the books
and teachers. We will learn Spanish from a BOOK, not from a
Spanish-speakingstudent; and not until 7th grade.

I have never felt it would be beneficial to stick my 6-yr. old in a room full
of other 6-yr. olds. I believe God created a world full of people of all ages
and sexes to insure that the younger ones and older ones learn from each
other. A few years ago, we were
living thousands of miles from any older family members, so I brought my kids
(then 5 and 2) to an assisted living facility, so they could interact with
the elderly. Staff members told us that many of the older people would wake up
every day and ask if we would be visiting soon. We always went on Wednesdays.
My daughters learned some old show tunes while one of the men played piano, and
the others would sing along. If I didn't have to chase my 2-yr. old around, I
would have had plenty of women ready to share the art of crocheting with me
(something I've always wanted to
learn.) If a friend was too sick to come out of their room during our visit,
we would often spend a few minutes in their room. I always let them give the
kids whatever cookies they had baked for them, and I ended up cleaning a few of
the apartments while we visited, simply because I would have done the same
for my own Grandmother. Every room had pictures from my kids posted on their
refrigerators. We called this "Visiting the Grandmas and Grandpas" and my
daughters both (almost 2 years later) have fond memories of our visits. I'm sure that
if we were still visiting there, my unborn child would have a thousand
handmade blankets and booties to keep him warm all winter.

I don't remember any such experiences in my entire School life, although I do
remember being a bit afraid of old people if they were too wrinkly or weak
looking. I never really knew anyone over 60. I never sped down the hall on
someone's wheelchair lap, squealing as we popped wheelies and screeched around
corners. I never got to hear stories about what life was like before indoor
plumbing and electricity, from the point of view of a woman with Alzheimers, who
might believe she was still 5 years old, talking with my daughter as if she
were a friend. I never got to
help a 90 yr. old woman keep her arm steady while she painted a picture. And
I never watched a room full of "grandma's" waiting for me by the window,
because we
were 15 minutes late.

On a recent visit to an Art Gallery, we noticed a man walking back and forth,
carrying framed artwork from his old pickup truck. I asked my 6 yr. old if she
thought he might be the artist. We both agreed that was a possibility, and
after a little pep-talk to overcome her stage fright, she approached him and
asked. He was the artist, and he was bringing in his work to be evaluated by the
curator. We all sat down and he explained some of his techniques and listened
to her opinions about which piece she liked best. He told about how he enjoyed
art when he was 6 and would "sell" pictures to family and friends. He
recounted how he felt while creating a few of the pieces, and how each one has
special meaning to him. He even let
her know how nervous he was to show them to the curator and how he hoped she
found them as interesting as we did. As he was called into the office, a group
of thirty-four 3rd graders filed past, ever so quietly, while their teacher
explained each piece on the walls. The children were so quiet and well behaved.
They didn't seem to mind moving on from one picture to the next (The problem
with homeschoolers is
they tend to linger on things they enjoy). They didn't seem to have any
questions or comments (Maybe they'll discuss that later in class). And they never
got a
chance to meet the gentleman in the pickup truck.

I hope my kids aren't missing out on any "socialization."

I am glad my children are missing out on public school socialization. Thanks and many blessings to each one of you and Merry Christmas. Missy

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 10:25 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: sneakers145

As Dr. Phil said on his show, history tends to repeat itself.  For most of humanity there were not public schools, and we seemed to do just fine without them in the past.  Since they are a recent development and have not doubt served their purpose (and continue to do so for the majority of society), I doubt that they will cease to exist anytime in the near future.

 

I do think my children learn more by being out and about where life is being lived can teach them more than a classroom.  Problem is, is that the school system is a behemoth and very difficult to change.  I doubt that my efforts or even those combined with other homeschooling parents could affect change soon enough to have any effect on my own children.

 

Notice I'm not blaming teachers or schools for society's ills.  I'm not.  But I speak with parents of other public school children here in town (my kids have many schooled friends) and the stuff their kids are exposed to at a young age is atrocious.

 

Before I'm accused of sheltering my children from the big bad world -- far from it.  We regularly discuss sex, drugs, pot, gays, gay marriage, nudity, porn, etc.  The thing about it is that at home, they're free to discuss it and get an ADULT's input.  On the bus, on the playground, many of these conversations take place OUT OF EARSHOT and without adult input.

The person you replied to is missing a whole lot of understanding.  In my opinion, public schools cannot be fixed.  Common Sense and Logic went out the door and political correctness stepped in.  The Good Lord and prayer went out the door and now Satan is more powerful than ever and children are becomming increasingly violent.  Schools do not stand a chance of being fixed.  Take a look in the differences of schools today and schools of the past.  Look at how different things were back when the purpose of school was to learn - now suddenly even intelligent people like Dr Phil think that the purpose is about learning to be social.  That is such a joke when you consider that no where in real life is that atmosphere duplicated.  Once a person grows up and reaches adulthood, fitting in is not such a big part of life for MOST people.

 

My kids will never be schooled by the system, we'll learn to be social from the real world, thank you very much!  The real world has evil too but at least a person can escape it - in the school, there is no escape because the system has to allow the evil.  Well, until it kills somebody - then it gets kicked out! 

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 11:26 am PST

No mention made of private schools

Quote From: lettiecs

I am not sure how I feel about "unschooling". We know of only one family who are unschoolers, and those children are not doing too well on any level. The children place no value on commitments or deadlines; However, I don't believe that is indicative of the majority of unschoolers.

 

I am homeschooling my daughter for a number of reasons,but will detail only the major points. She did attend kindergarten in our school district and then we saw the need to do something different.

 

Our daughter was tested at a 2nd grade level when she was admitted to kindergarten. The teachers called me to a conference and said that my daughter actually tapped out the 2nd grade charts, but  legally they could not test her any higher, nor were they allowed to place my daughter in the 3rd grade, which they believed was the level she should be placed at.

 So my child was in kindergarten where she was sent to 1st and 2nd grade classrooms for math, and reading. In doing this, she would miss out on field trips and recess time, which were scheduled for the times she was in the other classrooms.

My daughter felt left out and lonely. She was never with other children as she was getting her teaching from a couple of para educators in the classroom,and not actually mainstreamed.

She began to have severe asthma attacks and would be sent home from school. My daughter missed alot of school due to asthma and the need for a nebulizer machine, which the school could not administer to her.

 

 Currently my daughter is on a 6th grade level, and if she were still in the public school, she would only be in the 3rd grade. This is a very social child. She has taken dance classes, gymnastics and is in taekwondo. She is also involved in a youth group at church.,and there is also a homeschoolinging organization in our area, which organizes sports activities and field trips as well as art and science cooperatives.

Our daughter has many advantages over children who are in public schools. She does her studies in the morning and is usually finished by lunch. Then she helps me with the daycare children, and helps bake and clean, and of course, she gets to spend alot more time playing.  She is getting hands on learning as well as book studies, and will most likely graduate at age 16.

 

The most important change that has taken place, is that my daughter no longer has asthma. She is a socially and emotionally well-adjusted child.

 

Whereas public school is not the right option for my daughter, that doesn't make it wrong for someone else. Each child is an individual with specific needs.

Education is important and the options should be researched and weighed very carefully. Each parent has the responsibility to do what is best her their own children.

 

 

 

 

 

I am not a parent, so I can only draw on my own experience as a student from so many years ago.

 

My parents put me through a private religious school.  I know it was a great sacrifice for them, but they did it and I feel I received a good education from that school. 

 

Regarding this school debate and the recent show on "unschooling," my personal opinion is that home schooling should be an option for students up to the 6th grade.  Above that, they really need the socializing skills they would learn from being in a school environment.  Although I do acknowledge the presence of programs such as 4H, scouting, community theatre and the like, they really are no substitute, except perhaps for church youth groups, which can provide many of the social skills a home-schooled student would not receive otherwise.

 

However, while the pros and cons of each method were debated, the one option that was not mentioned was private school.  Everyone was emphasizing the importantance of public schools (although I think public school is a huge failure, myself); however, some mention, at the very least, should have been made about private schools.  Not all private schools are religious.  There are many non-religious private schools in this country that can hold their own against any public school.

 

Public school really isn't a viable choice, in my opinion.  Classes in some schools are so large, students are lucky if they can get more than a minute or two of personal time with a teacher.  In the private school I attended, the classes were small enough so that teachers could devote much of their time to the needs of their students.  No "wham, bam, thank you ma'am" as in public schools; instead, the students were allowed to learn at their own pace, with a little encouragement from the teachers.

 

I have heard many people say that private schools have nothing to offer their students.  That's where they are wrong.  In my own years of private schooling, I sung in the school choir and learned the piano, played on the basketball team, was involved in the pep club, worked on the yearbook committee, assisted in the audio-visual department, and participated in school theatre.  And because it was a religious school, I was involved in the school's nursing-home and community choir ministries.  There were also field trips to zoos, museums, etc.  So I was quite involved with extra-curricular school activities.

 

What it all boils down to is this:  a high-school diploma is really nothing more than a license to learn.

 

As I said at the beginning of my post, I am not a parent.  But if I were one, I would put my children though private school, even if it meant sacrificing a lot.  My parents did it for me, and I feel I am a better person for it.

 

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
November 28, 2006, 11:34 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: science24

I was unschooled, got a full scholarship to a 4 year university, and I'm finishing up a Phd in genetics. I also know more about us and world histort then many of my peers, I've read more then many of my graduate school peers ( a highly educated bunch) abd I've taught math, logic and ethics at the university level. Clearly unschoolers can learn these things, I expect your son may have surprised you had he been unschooled.

Actually, he surprised me regardless...he's an awesome kid!

 

Thanks for your testimony, but I actually posted this several days ago before I even knew what unschooling is.  If it worked for you...that's great!

 

Marie

 
First | Prev | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | Next | Last