Quote From: ghgdmsIt is obvious that this parental alienation issue has been around for quite some time. There are many, many scarred kids who are now grown ups that speak and write about their personal unfortunate circumstances. Look at the emotion and the interest that is generated by today's show. Go in any library and see all the books addressing a problem that did not originate last week or last year. Search online for parental alienation (PA) or parental alienation syndrome (PAS)...you will be amazed at the volume of documented, specifics on the seriousness of the problems...cases happening today...and, without much imagination, one can get a good visual on the magnitude of this compounding problem looking forward.
There are hostile, aggressive dad's and mom's...don't miss this point...our grandchildren have been alienated from their biological mother (our daughter), from us, our daughters' friends and blood relatives. Our daughter's ex, even after his remarriage and the passage of almost 4 yrs time, has successfully navigated the California family court system to avoid compliance with original and subsequent court orders for 50/50 custody and 50/50 visitation. In fact, his superb manipulative skills; deep pockets of continuing income; and, angry, vindictive nature...coupled with "brainwashing" techniques practiced from more than a few years before their separation...has surely caused psychological damages to two young boys.
There are two (2) important matters that MUST be addressed without further delay. First: Family courts have let our children down by not originally REQUIRING that divorcing parents always allow children to continue loving and interacting with BOTH parents. Exceptions only need occur when one or the other parent is disqualified from contact with his/her children because of a court recognized issue. Second: Mental health and psychological agencies must be forced to recognize and address the seriousness of this matter. We cannot any longer tolerate such an extensive "syndrome" being ignored and swept under the rug. Look...if they cannot bring themselves to establish a meaningful standard for diagnosis of this character/behavioral mental illness which adversely affected so many children for so many years, that can be applied by the money-grubbing psychological therapists and evaluators, we need to have them put out of business.
My mother actually called me to watch this show today, since it hit home on my existing situation.
I left the marital home under duress from an antagonizing and controlling spouse who told me after our daughter was born that she and the child don't need me anymore. This was extremely painful, after I did everything to ensure her and the baby were healthy in the first 1-1/2 yrs of my daughter's life. I even let my ex-wife stay home from work for a year to care and bond with our first and only child. When I left in Aug 2005, I could only see my daughter in the marital home, but insisted that the mother not be present. This was because I feared the mother would continue to make false allegations of domestic violence and call the authorities on me. She had done this 3 times before I left and there was no evidence of violence, but police reports were taken. I saw the writing on the wall and feared for my safety (and even hers if she pushed me to the brink) and had no choice but to leave the situation before it escalated to something far worse. Therefore, I saw my daughter in the marital home with a caregiver/nanny present. I could not even retrieve my personal property until Dec 2005 by court order and then my visitation was established.
Through a bitter divorce the mother alleged I was an endangerment to my child driving due to sleep apnea and further alleged I was a drug user. I was under therapy for my sleep apnea which posed no dangers at all and was not a drug user. Finally a divorce decree was given in Dec 2006, but since I had not been with my daughter other than twice a week for 2 hrs under the previous order, the court, on the advice of a psychiatrist, decided to put me on a transitional "unsupervised" visitation of two days a week for (2) hrs over 2 months beginning in Feb 2007 and extended to (5) hrs beginning in April 2007. The full visitation was to begin in Jan 2008. On my 3rd and last home visit with my daughter (now 3) at the beginning of the 5 hr visits, my ex-wife reported me to Child Protective Services alleging that my daughter was sexually abused by her father in the home. The next month, she went to court to suspend all contact between me and our child, while I took her to court for contempt of my visitations. I have payed for childcare before the divorce and a ridiculous amount of child support for one child (because our incomes exceeded 1980s statute guidelines) afterwards, along with all health benefits for my daughter to this day. The mother reported to the Child Protective Services, during the investigation, that she had been sexually abused by her father when she was child. The family services finally concluded their investigation of the complaint, which was "unfounded", but it was in the jurisdiction where I lived and not that of the mother & child.
Back into court again to present my case. With no evidence of abuse by me, the mother presents witnesses (daycare workers) that saw our child act in a sexualized manner. The judge finally orders that the child have a forensic evaluation to see if she had been abused. I was then placed on "supervised" visitation in May 2007, which I'm still on, awaiting another re-scheduled trial which was to occur in Sept 2008. The forensic evaluator, Dr. Joyanna Silberg, who recently appeared on the MIke & Juliet show, ridicules PAS, particularly in light of Alec Baldwin's new book on the market. When she was selected as the court-appointed forensic evaluator, I reviewed her male-bashing website which also argued that PAS was used by fathers to get custody and escape child support.. She interviewed me and never once considered that my ex-wife was sexually abused as a child, had made these false allegations in court, and was deliberately interferring with my contact and visitation with our child. Her report biasly tried to link the child's behavior to her father, even though the child was not credible for any disclosure and there was never any evidence of abuse by me. This is PAS to the Nth Degree and it has financially drained me to fight for my daughter's well-being, who has been subjected to mental & health professionals (not just the two (2) forensic evaluations, but numerous Dr. visits for all kinds of symptoms) and I fear she has been mentally abused for something that never occurred.
I consistently have maintained this restricted supervised visitation environment in the interest of my daughter. The motivation that keeps me going is seeing my daughter's smile when she sees me every visit and of course calling me "Daddy". Gifts that I have given her during visits are never seen again. I love that my daughter voluntarily tells me she loves me, asks for hugs and kisses, all in the presence of a supervised monitor in a small play room. I haven't even been able to take my daughter outside to a park next door since Oct 2007, because the mother alleged the monitor was not close enough to hear our conversations, eventhough the monitor insisted she was doing her job. I have not even been able to take a picture of my daughter for a year to show to her grandparents (who haven't seen her since she was 1 yrs old), because the mother alleges the child poses in a sexually suggestive manner. The mother also restricted me from providing any food during visitation, citing the child is overweight and is on a strict diet.
The agencies that provide supervised court ordered visitations are often non-profits who use volunteers, so my daughter and I have seen over 10 different staff since May 2007. No consistency for the child and she's had to adapt to all these different strangers that come and go. These agencies also put in place rules to restrict non-custodial parent's interaction and bonding when "sexual abuse" is alleged, but insist they are acting in the best interest of the child, even when there is no evidence of abuse or there is no discomfort of the child during visits.
I'm sorry for this long reply, but as you can tell it has been very frustrating. I guess writing this has allowed me to vent my feelings and just see how many other fathers are in anguish over their rights to their children being infringed upon. I've only been able to maintain by keeping my focus on my daughter, praying a hell of a lot with the love and support of family and friends and trying to keep my sanity to maintain my job. I've witnessed an inept legal system, even when no evidence is presented to prove any allegations, mental professionals seeking more money for questionable evaluations and of course major attorney fees (I'm on my 2nd attorney who specializes in false sexual abuse cases). After now filing for custody, as my only alternative to save my daughter from a mentally disturbed over-protective mother, I'm still awaiting a chance to present the merits of my case to the court. The BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD does not even seem to be a paramount concern, as my daughter has been subjected to numerous doctors and mental health professionals and has only seen her father in a small playroom, two times a week, for 2 hrs, since she was 3 yrs old. She is now 4-1/2 and it's still not over. It's been 3 yrs of hell since I left in Aug 2005, but I'm determined to keep up the fight for my daughter's welfare, until I'm no longer financially able. If my ex-wife wins, I can only imagine how she will tell our daughter how her father never loved her and abandoned the family. I know my daugher will grow up and seek the truth and I've kept a library of evidence. I won't have to ever bad mouth the mother, since my daughter will see all the true evidence for herself. Daddy Loves You-Sweetheart !