Quote From: angelsmuchI am sorry that it seems that I offended you. I did take your message personally. You seemed very angry in your last response. The way you acted made me think you were probably prjecting your feelings onto me.
I only wrote in because it seems that most of the people who have responded are pretty one sided. I however, see another side to this story. For instance: if I was the father in this case I definetley wouldn't have driven the three hours (that was claimed) to pick up my boys on a weekend that was questionable. I would have made sure that I was going to get my kids long before making that kind of drive. Also, he said he had papers stating that it was his weekend. There is no way he had papers the biomom didn't have. The court system doesn't work that way. IF, somehow he did have papers proving it was his weekend, why did we not see them? Why didn't he call the police and have them deal with it? If he really had papers that said it was his weekend then he had options. I don't believe he had anything. I think that was a lie! I think it was not his weekend and he was just trying to pull a fast one and make the mom look bad. I think he thought he could force the biomom into giving in to him by bringing the cameras. I also think I heard the biomom say that the BOYS had plans for the weekend. That in itself would make it such that the boys couldn't go with thier dad to ice cream.
I felt the scene in the car when the stepmom is crying about them not getting the boys (when they had just had them the weekend before) was a little over the top. How fake can you be?
Dr. Phil also stated that it is pretty hard to imagine somebody making up all the name calling and such that took place on the biodad and stepmom's side. You could see the "deer cought in headlights look" on both the biodad and the stepmom. If that doesn't scream "I just got busted" I don't know what does.
I look at it like this, at least the biomom can admit when she has not handled herself in the best way. I can't say the same for the biodad and stepmom.
You seem pretty steadfast in who you supported on this show. Perhaps it's because it rang similar to your situation. (From what I've read of your other posts.) However, like I said, we were posting about the SHOW. I am not angry at anyone. Just frustrated with how parents act, but then tell their kids to do the right thing.
Just for the sake of argument, if you are so obliged, then would you consider the following?
1. The father driving down to attempt to pick up his kids for what he believed to be his weekend.
-- If the father did not attempt to pick up his kids, then the mother could have come back and said, "oh yah, it was your weekend but you missed it, so this next weekend is mine too." Also, if he did not make the attempt, then he could not claim contempt of the custody order. He couldn't say, "well, she called me and told me I couldn't pick up the kids this weekend." Plus, there was the slightest bit of a chance that she would have let the kids go with him, so he had to try.
2. The papers.
-- The father claimed he had papers, the mother claims there is a "verbal agreement" otherwise. That leads me to beleive that the papers do state which weekend is which, but the mother thinks the "verbal agreement" overrides any other agreements. However, it only takes one person to say there was never a verbal agreement, and like that, there never was one. Judges don't take "verbal agreements" into account very often, unless there is witnesses to see both sides of an agreement take place (not just someone hearing one side of a conversation over the phone.) Also, an interesting thing to note: even signed agreements between parents aren't held up in court. The are looked at for "intention." Only court orders can be held up in court.
3. You say the father had options.
-- You say that the father could have called the police to enforce his parenting time. A lot of jurisdictions will not do anything. If you've spent any time on the internet about custody issues, you would find that many people all across the U.S. have problems with their local authorities enforcing custody issues. It sounds outrageous, but it does happen (a lot more than not these days.) A lot of police officers will say that it is a family court matter. This could have been one reason we did not see the police go with the father.
--Another thing is, if you do get the police to enforce custody orders, then it doesn't always look good on the parent who called the police for assistance. Usually these matters end back up in the family court to determine contempt. Judges need to consider if the actions the parents took was in the best interest of the child(ren). It's not a desirable thing for a child to see the police come to their house and make them go with the other parent. Courts encourage contempt matters to be taken up with the courts, rather than to get the police involved and further damage the children.
I can see both sides of the situation (on the show), because I worked for a family law lawyer for a number of years. I just happen to find the mother not too credible, but as you said in one of your previous posts, we needed more information than we got on the show. Working for a family law lawyer has made me work hard to get along with my ex and his wife, for the sake of our children.
I think this show, however, really missed the mark on what needed to happen for this family. I think Dr. Phil should have given better advice on how to co-parent. It was obvious that the mom and the dad/stepmom had different views on how to raise the boys. That is probably where the conflicts arise. I'm hoping we see an update with this family to see how they've come along since the show.