09/27 Should We Have A Baby?
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | next » | lastShow Format
Posted by: pennymh
Posted on: 2002-09-23 09:24:06
Dr. Phil, I love you like crazy, I never missed a Tuesday on Oprah and I tape your show daily. But I want to say that after watching the 1st week, I'm dissapointed to see that the show is featuring too many guests. It's like Sally-Jessie. When you have too many guests, you don't spend enough time with any of them and they don't get the full benefit of your wisdom and neither does the audience. I would like to see 2 guests, one for each half of the show. Then you can really get into it with them, and with us. Don't let your show turn into a "fast food" daytime show.
Thanks.
Posted by: pennymh
Posted on: 2002-09-23 09:24:06
Dr. Phil, I love you like crazy, I never missed a Tuesday on Oprah and I tape your show daily. But I want to say that after watching the 1st week, I'm dissapointed to see that the show is featuring too many guests. It's like Sally-Jessie. When you have too many guests, you don't spend enough time with any of them and they don't get the full benefit of your wisdom and neither does the audience. I would like to see 2 guests, one for each half of the show. Then you can really get into it with them, and with us. Don't let your show turn into a "fast food" daytime show.
Thanks.
Show Format
Posted by: high_heels
Posted on: 2002-09-27 22:07:28
I agree with pennymp.
Like the "I hate being a mommy show".
Three different issues of why a woman hates being a mom.
"The I had kids young mother."
"The stay-at-home mother."
"The death and guilt mother."
These should have been three different shows.
Even if there are many guests, the main issue cause should be the same.
Same thoughts regarding the Marriage and Sex show.
And a note to the webmaster: It would make the message boards alot less confusing if we could search the board messages by date and/or author, the volume of messages makes it very hard to just hit next page or previous page to check for replies.
And while I'm here, just in case the webmaster is really reading any of this...
you have a adoption board, but I think you should add an abortion board.
You'll figure it all out!
Posted by: high_heels
Posted on: 2002-09-27 22:07:28
I agree with pennymp.
Like the "I hate being a mommy show".
Three different issues of why a woman hates being a mom.
"The I had kids young mother."
"The stay-at-home mother."
"The death and guilt mother."
These should have been three different shows.
Even if there are many guests, the main issue cause should be the same.
Same thoughts regarding the Marriage and Sex show.
And a note to the webmaster: It would make the message boards alot less confusing if we could search the board messages by date and/or author, the volume of messages makes it very hard to just hit next page or previous page to check for replies.
And while I'm here, just in case the webmaster is really reading any of this...
you have a adoption board, but I think you should add an abortion board.
You'll figure it all out!
Well said!
Posted by: maggieanne
Posted on: 2002-09-29 17:50:11
I also agree with pennymh. After just two episodes I felt the same way. I wish there were fewer guests so that more time could be spent with each. So far, I liked Tuesdays on Oprah better.
Posted by: maggieanne
Posted on: 2002-09-29 17:50:11
I also agree with pennymh. After just two episodes I felt the same way. I wish there were fewer guests so that more time could be spent with each. So far, I liked Tuesdays on Oprah better.
DITTO
Posted by: caro_m
Posted on: 2002-09-29 21:33:33
I completely agree... I loved the Oprah format and found it refreshing. Tuesdays on Oprah were one of the only shows I watched regularly. I too think that what made it so great was the depth which you were able to go into with the guests. I have not seen the same quality on your new show (though it's till better than other shows).
Posted by: caro_m
Posted on: 2002-09-29 21:33:33
I completely agree... I loved the Oprah format and found it refreshing. Tuesdays on Oprah were one of the only shows I watched regularly. I too think that what made it so great was the depth which you were able to go into with the guests. I have not seen the same quality on your new show (though it's till better than other shows).
Dr. Phil-Oprah chemistry missing
Posted by: kiwikik
Posted on: 2002-09-30 01:37:56
Hi. I, too, preferred the Tues. Oprah segments. I think what we may be missing is the chemistry that existed between Phil and Oprah. It was pretty special. The little comments and questions that Oprah came in with rounded out Phil's contributions.
I also get the feeling that items are being "rushed" in order to get on with the next item. However, any new show is bound to have areas that need polishing.
I just hope that the audience can be kept long enough for the kinks to be ironed out, as I think Dr. Phil and his commonsense approach is really good.....certainly I look at happenings in my own life and ask myself, "What would Dr. Phil say?", and it helps me work out how I should respond or what changes I need to make in how I am approaching a problem.
I find these message boards really confusing to use.....and am rapidly getting turned off with them. I am active on two other message boards. Each has a different approach, but both are much easier to use. I think that Dr. Phil should take a look at the format Montel Williams uses for his message boards. It is clear, easy to navigate, and certain threads are kept together.
Posted by: kiwikik
Posted on: 2002-09-30 01:37:56
Hi. I, too, preferred the Tues. Oprah segments. I think what we may be missing is the chemistry that existed between Phil and Oprah. It was pretty special. The little comments and questions that Oprah came in with rounded out Phil's contributions.
I also get the feeling that items are being "rushed" in order to get on with the next item. However, any new show is bound to have areas that need polishing.
I just hope that the audience can be kept long enough for the kinks to be ironed out, as I think Dr. Phil and his commonsense approach is really good.....certainly I look at happenings in my own life and ask myself, "What would Dr. Phil say?", and it helps me work out how I should respond or what changes I need to make in how I am approaching a problem.
I find these message boards really confusing to use.....and am rapidly getting turned off with them. I am active on two other message boards. Each has a different approach, but both are much easier to use. I think that Dr. Phil should take a look at the format Montel Williams uses for his message boards. It is clear, easy to navigate, and certain threads are kept together.
Views
Posted by: philboard
Posted on: 2002-09-30 13:59:15
You might try changing the way you are viewing these boards. Threads are kept together but there are two different ways to view, one threaded, one non-threaded. Let me know if you are still having problems and I'll try to walk you through!
Posted by: philboard
Posted on: 2002-09-30 13:59:15
You might try changing the way you are viewing these boards. Threads are kept together but there are two different ways to view, one threaded, one non-threaded. Let me know if you are still having problems and I'll try to walk you through!
I don't agree with you at all
Posted by: dawntamara
Posted on: 2002-10-03 10:54:51
I think Dr. Phil has got it goin' on! I'm only 21 years old and I know that ALL of my friends and co-workers talk about the show all the time and love it to death. Maybe it's just a younger generation thing, but I really don't think so.
Most of us are very happy that he has his own show now and think that he doesn't need chemistry!;) In fact a lot of us have our vcr's set to record the show in case we have to miss it! I think that the audience will do nothing but grow and grow and grow.
Furthermore, I found the message board to be quite simple. Why should he do what Montel is doing? He's not Montel, he's Dr. Phil!
Posted by: dawntamara
Posted on: 2002-10-03 10:54:51
I think Dr. Phil has got it goin' on! I'm only 21 years old and I know that ALL of my friends and co-workers talk about the show all the time and love it to death. Maybe it's just a younger generation thing, but I really don't think so.
Most of us are very happy that he has his own show now and think that he doesn't need chemistry!;) In fact a lot of us have our vcr's set to record the show in case we have to miss it! I think that the audience will do nothing but grow and grow and grow.
Furthermore, I found the message board to be quite simple. Why should he do what Montel is doing? He's not Montel, he's Dr. Phil!
I disagree
Posted by: imsome
Posted on: 2002-10-04 20:05:56
First of all, I can't stand Oprah. Never have been able to watch her show. I started watching on Tuesdays only to watch Dr Phil, because I liked his style - he's like Dr Laura without the psychosis!
I really like his show now. Being Oprah-less really adds to the impact. I found that Oprah, just by being Oprah, detracted from the point of what Dr Phil was saying (usually by crying) and that without her the reality of what Dr Phil says comes through more.
Posted by: imsome
Posted on: 2002-10-04 20:05:56
First of all, I can't stand Oprah. Never have been able to watch her show. I started watching on Tuesdays only to watch Dr Phil, because I liked his style - he's like Dr Laura without the psychosis!
I really like his show now. Being Oprah-less really adds to the impact. I found that Oprah, just by being Oprah, detracted from the point of what Dr Phil was saying (usually by crying) and that without her the reality of what Dr Phil says comes through more.
I agree but....
Posted by: prostock69
Posted on: 2002-09-30 10:38:18
If you remember on the first show, Dr. Phil said he wasn't going to do "therapy" but just get people pointed in the right direction. This is why he's not going to spend a whole show on one person or couple's problem because then it would end up in a "therapy" session.
I miss Tuesdays on Oprah too. Dr. Phil seems undirected at times. He's definately out of his element trying to do what Oprah did on Tuesdays. Maybe he needs someone else to direct the show, read the teleprompter, etc.
But I still love this show and have taped every episode and I will continue to do so. It will take some time for this show to come together so we all need to be a little patient.
As far as these message boards go, I HATE THEM!!! I post on ParentsPlace.com and I love how the boards are done there. The posts are colasped and you can see who has posted to your post easily. You can see every post on one page too. You don't have to go to the next page. If you get a chance, check out parentsplace.com and take a look at their board's setup.
Peace!
Posted by: prostock69
Posted on: 2002-09-30 10:38:18
If you remember on the first show, Dr. Phil said he wasn't going to do "therapy" but just get people pointed in the right direction. This is why he's not going to spend a whole show on one person or couple's problem because then it would end up in a "therapy" session.
I miss Tuesdays on Oprah too. Dr. Phil seems undirected at times. He's definately out of his element trying to do what Oprah did on Tuesdays. Maybe he needs someone else to direct the show, read the teleprompter, etc.
But I still love this show and have taped every episode and I will continue to do so. It will take some time for this show to come together so we all need to be a little patient.
As far as these message boards go, I HATE THEM!!! I post on ParentsPlace.com and I love how the boards are done there. The posts are colasped and you can see who has posted to your post easily. You can see every post on one page too. You don't have to go to the next page. If you get a chance, check out parentsplace.com and take a look at their board's setup.
Peace!
I agree
Posted by: cfs8642
Posted on: 2002-10-01 11:06:01
Dr Phil, narrow it down to (2) two guest per hour. There is a lot more to their stories that I would like to hear. Really enjoy the show.
Posted by: cfs8642
Posted on: 2002-10-01 11:06:01
Dr Phil, narrow it down to (2) two guest per hour. There is a lot more to their stories that I would like to hear. Really enjoy the show.
CFS
Posted by: bea100
Posted on: 2002-10-02 06:54:23
I agree w/you. I watch Dr. Phil daily and feel sometimes he is moving too fast. The issues with a person or couple are not getting addressed.
Posted by: bea100
Posted on: 2002-10-02 06:54:23
I agree w/you. I watch Dr. Phil daily and feel sometimes he is moving too fast. The issues with a person or couple are not getting addressed.
DITTO
Posted by: msang99
Posted on: 2003-07-03 15:23:39
I TOTALLY AGREE!!! Too many guests on one show? You leave me hanging, wanting to go home with the guest to see what happens. Dr. Phil seems rushed, like speed dating, only it is speed healing!!
Posted by: msang99
Posted on: 2003-07-03 15:23:39
I TOTALLY AGREE!!! Too many guests on one show? You leave me hanging, wanting to go home with the guest to see what happens. Dr. Phil seems rushed, like speed dating, only it is speed healing!!
Kids: Can't Agree?
Posted by: suslev56
Posted on: 2002-09-27 08:22:30
This week has been even better than the first, in terms of dealing with the parenting questions. "Should You Have A Baby?" will be a very interesting program to watch. One thing not addressed, I noticed, is the fact that many parents assume their children will turn out healthy and happy, and are devastated when one or the other doesn't happen. A child born with severe physical or mental handicaps will require more love, care, supervision, and yes it has to be mentioned, MONEY. I found that out the hard way when at 2 1/2 years of age, my son was diagnosed with Pervasive Developmental Disorder, a mild form of autism. We were very lucky, in that he was able to talk well (with the help of a $70/hr. speech pathologist), improve his motor skills (with the help of $75/hr. occupational therapy)and attend school. Luckily, VA has an excellent public school program for special needs; parents who live in other states often have to find private schools, which will cost even more.
Couples have to consider so much when it comes to having children. It's not always possible to dot all i's and cross all t's, but it helps to think of as many "what if" questions before a first pregnancy occurs. I decided my son would be my only child, and if anyone came into my life at this point, I would make that clear from the beginning, so there's no misunderstanding on this issue. If that was a problem, there would not be a relationship.
Susan
Posted by: suslev56
Posted on: 2002-09-27 08:22:30
This week has been even better than the first, in terms of dealing with the parenting questions. "Should You Have A Baby?" will be a very interesting program to watch. One thing not addressed, I noticed, is the fact that many parents assume their children will turn out healthy and happy, and are devastated when one or the other doesn't happen. A child born with severe physical or mental handicaps will require more love, care, supervision, and yes it has to be mentioned, MONEY. I found that out the hard way when at 2 1/2 years of age, my son was diagnosed with Pervasive Developmental Disorder, a mild form of autism. We were very lucky, in that he was able to talk well (with the help of a $70/hr. speech pathologist), improve his motor skills (with the help of $75/hr. occupational therapy)and attend school. Luckily, VA has an excellent public school program for special needs; parents who live in other states often have to find private schools, which will cost even more.
Couples have to consider so much when it comes to having children. It's not always possible to dot all i's and cross all t's, but it helps to think of as many "what if" questions before a first pregnancy occurs. I decided my son would be my only child, and if anyone came into my life at this point, I would make that clear from the beginning, so there's no misunderstanding on this issue. If that was a problem, there would not be a relationship.
Susan
KIDS:Can't agree
Posted by: mom335
Posted on: 2002-09-27 15:41:41
I'm the mother of three,our middle son has mild autism too.We found out when he was 5,he's 7 now.At first it was very hard,specially on me,since I put all the blame on me,I felt like it was my fault no matter what the doctors or my husband said to me.He's doing so well now,he's in school,he loves it.His teachers are great,and he gets a lot of help and love from his two brothers.And ofcourse us too.We are so proud of him,as hard as it was at first.I can't imagine our lives without him!God gave him to us for a reason,and we feel very blessed to have him and our other children in our lives.
Posted by: mom335
Posted on: 2002-09-27 15:41:41
I'm the mother of three,our middle son has mild autism too.We found out when he was 5,he's 7 now.At first it was very hard,specially on me,since I put all the blame on me,I felt like it was my fault no matter what the doctors or my husband said to me.He's doing so well now,he's in school,he loves it.His teachers are great,and he gets a lot of help and love from his two brothers.And ofcourse us too.We are so proud of him,as hard as it was at first.I can't imagine our lives without him!God gave him to us for a reason,and we feel very blessed to have him and our other children in our lives.
kids can't agree
Posted by: marygracet
Posted on: 2003-01-04 12:05:56
I too am the mom of a boy with Pervasice Developmental Disorder (autism spectrum). He is my first of two childdren. He is truly a gift from God as is my daughter...all children are a gift. He wasn't easy when he was two years old, but now at the age of four he is such a pleasure to be with..thanks to lots of teachers being in our home for 2 years. I want more kids. All kids can be challenging..but I think parents know what they can handle and parents should not have kis if they both don't want them.
Posted by: marygracet
Posted on: 2003-01-04 12:05:56
I too am the mom of a boy with Pervasice Developmental Disorder (autism spectrum). He is my first of two childdren. He is truly a gift from God as is my daughter...all children are a gift. He wasn't easy when he was two years old, but now at the age of four he is such a pleasure to be with..thanks to lots of teachers being in our home for 2 years. I want more kids. All kids can be challenging..but I think parents know what they can handle and parents should not have kis if they both don't want them.
Kids are a gift
Posted by: sisnzeb
Posted on: 2002-09-27 08:37:10
I love Dr. Phil and his practical advice. But, on this issue, I disagree. Yes, we owe our children the best we have to offer and money should be a part of the discussion before having children, but ultimately, children are a gift from God and He will provide for them. If we would turn to God first, this issue would not be so hard to understand, as with so many issues in our lives. Please seek what God wants for your lives instead of what the world says is right!!
Posted by: sisnzeb
Posted on: 2002-09-27 08:37:10
I love Dr. Phil and his practical advice. But, on this issue, I disagree. Yes, we owe our children the best we have to offer and money should be a part of the discussion before having children, but ultimately, children are a gift from God and He will provide for them. If we would turn to God first, this issue would not be so hard to understand, as with so many issues in our lives. Please seek what God wants for your lives instead of what the world says is right!!
Just a thought
Posted by: mspeapods
Posted on: 2002-09-27 09:10:14
I can appreciate faith and I am a Christian myself...but saying "God will provide" is not a realistic statement. God helps he who helps himself. If God really just provided, then why are there children and people all over the world dehydrated, starved, abused, uneducated, etc. It's great to have faith, but we need to be realistic and not shift OUR responsibility to God. God doesn't always provide. That's why he sent US to help HIM take care of our children.
Posted by: mspeapods
Posted on: 2002-09-27 09:10:14
I can appreciate faith and I am a Christian myself...but saying "God will provide" is not a realistic statement. God helps he who helps himself. If God really just provided, then why are there children and people all over the world dehydrated, starved, abused, uneducated, etc. It's great to have faith, but we need to be realistic and not shift OUR responsibility to God. God doesn't always provide. That's why he sent US to help HIM take care of our children.
Posted by: sesibby
Posted on: 2002-09-27 13:22:41
Too many people blame God for things that are OUR responsiblity and not God's fault. If we don't do our part and just wait for God to provide, when it doesn't happen we blame God. I agree we are responsible for doing all we can and put it in God's hands for the end result--His plan for our life. Thank you for making such a valid, realistic, and well-stated point!
not true Scripture
Posted by: khbiwphil
Posted on: 2002-09-27 15:41:18
God does NOT (contrary to popular opinion) help those who help themselves. That is not in scripture!
Posted by: khbiwphil
Posted on: 2002-09-27 15:41:18
God does NOT (contrary to popular opinion) help those who help themselves. That is not in scripture!
